Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 440
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $317,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Double M Farms, LLC | Newport, VA 24128 | $3,601 |
22 | Gregory Wayne Waddle | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $3,511 |
23 | Guthrie Farms LLC | Dublin, VA 24084 | $3,473 |
24 | Seth Everett Heath | Marion, VA 24354 | $3,429 |
25 | John W Montgomery | Hillsville, VA 24343 | $3,357 |
26 | Leonard Craig Hammond | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $3,339 |
27 | Walter J Robinson | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $3,187 |
28 | John K King Jr | Myrtle Beach, SC 29572 | $3,088 |
29 | Jesse W Via | Patrick Springs, VA 24133 | $2,878 |
30 | Akers Farm LLC | Dublin, VA 24084 | $2,859 |
31 | Mary M Atwell | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $2,572 |
32 | Maude Debusk | Rose Hill, VA 24281 | $2,429 |
33 | Maria Douthat Flinchum | Draper, VA 24324 | $2,362 |
34 | Benjamin H Fannon | Pennington Gap, VA 24277 | $2,349 |
35 | Martin P Farrier III | Newport, VA 24128 | $2,139 |
36 | Richdale Farm | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $2,110 |
37 | J Nelson Goad | Willis, VA 24380 | $1,995 |
38 | David Clement | Patrick Springs, VA 24133 | $1,905 |
39 | Richard Cornwall Peverall Jr | New Castle, VA 24127 | $1,904 |
40 | Charles M Orfield | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $1,869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”