Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,300

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $24,084,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Steven T MccroskeyMendota, VA 24270$52,782
62Richard BerrierCana, VA 24317$52,139
63Michael Claude EdwardsLambsburg, VA 24351$51,920
64Halls Plants & Produce Inc.Ararat, VA 24053$51,637
65R Dalford PhillipsDraper, VA 24324$51,589
66Eldon PainterHillsville, VA 24343$49,776
67Deborah B GoadHillsville, VA 24343$49,007
68Tommy ShraderRosedale, VA 24280$48,970
69Raymond A CampbellSaltville, VA 24370$48,850
70David E PainterHillsville, VA 24343$47,110
71Brandon William BunnDublin, VA 24084$46,310
72Maple Bend FarmsMeadowview, VA 24361$44,660
73James HayesMouth Of Wilson, VA 24363$44,361
74Andrew Jackson Arrington IvGlade Spring, VA 24340$44,238
75Brian M UmbergerWytheville, VA 24382$43,863
76Ewing Livestock Market IncSpeedwell, TN 37870$43,395
77Richdale FarmWytheville, VA 24382$43,317
78Barbara C BucklandRich Creek, VA 24147$43,010
79Charles Richard CreggerCrockett, VA 24323$42,811
803e Farms LLCDublin, VA 24084$42,733

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag