Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Virginia
(Rep. Morgan Griffith)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,241
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $13,189,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Amber Brannock | Galax, VA 24333 | $35,502 |
82 | James Kent Musick Jr | Lebanon, VA 24266 | $34,950 |
83 | Martin P Farrier III | Newport, VA 24128 | $34,630 |
84 | Stuart Land & Cattle Co Of Virginia Inc | Rosedale, VA 24280 | $34,395 |
85 | Andy Taylor | Elk Creek, VA 24326 | $34,297 |
86 | Sabrina B Webb | Fancy Gap, VA 24328 | $34,082 |
87 | Jennifer Hollingsworth | Mouth Of Wilson, VA 24363 | $34,030 |
88 | Shanna J Ward | Galax, VA 24333 | $33,813 |
89 | T-l Livestock LLC | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $33,430 |
90 | , | $32,354 | |
91 | Primmland Farms LLC | Dugspur, VA 24325 | $32,330 |
92 | Double M Farms, LLC | Newport, VA 24128 | $32,139 |
93 | Gary D Largen | Dugspur, VA 24325 | $31,673 |
94 | Kirk Brothers | Independence, VA 24348 | $31,652 |
95 | Gregory Scott Huffman | Newport, VA 24128 | $31,403 |
96 | Terri Larue Painter | Meadows Of Dan, VA 24120 | $31,213 |
97 | Tamela S Stuart | Bland, VA 24315 | $30,333 |
98 | Mason Hudgins | Rural Retreat, VA 24368 | $30,120 |
99 | Richard Glenn Kauffman | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $29,546 |
100 | Thomas R Stone Jr | Max Meadows, VA 24360 | $29,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”