Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 931
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $1,397,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James C Harrison Jr | Hillsville, VA 24343 | $3,172 |
102 | Shelby Ervin | Clinchport, VA 24244 | $3,162 |
103 | Larry L Wyatt | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $3,075 |
104 | E Frank Logan | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $3,068 |
105 | Lipes Farm | New Castle, VA 24127 | $3,061 |
106 | James H Campbell | Saltville, VA 24370 | $3,002 |
107 | E Vincent Ennis | Waynesboro, VA 22980 | $2,990 |
108 | Caressie C Marcum | Jonesville, VA 24263 | $2,962 |
109 | Olen W Spivey | Galax, VA 24333 | $2,943 |
110 | Bobby W Elliott | Fries, VA 24330 | $2,932 |
111 | Roger D Forrester | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $2,931 |
112 | Ellis M Kincer Jr | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $2,921 |
113 | Jerry Groseclose | Ceres, VA 24318 | $2,919 |
114 | Bobby L Combs | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $2,913 |
115 | Joe B Kendrick | Honaker, VA 24260 | $2,888 |
116 | James W Price | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $2,857 |
117 | Roger D Goughnour | Barren Springs, VA 24313 | $2,779 |
118 | Bill Brockman | Rose Hill, VA 24281 | $2,771 |
119 | Fred H Combs | Tazewell, VA 24651 | $2,769 |
120 | Darrell K Layne | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $2,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”