Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 12,640
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $10,514,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John A Myers | Jonesville, VA 24263 | $10,489 |
102 | Estate Of Shannon Ray Maness | Blackwater, VA 24221 | $10,487 |
103 | Joseph Johnson | Castlewood, VA 24224 | $10,469 |
104 | Denver R Browning | Knoxville, TN 37922 | $10,406 |
105 | David Finney | Mouth Of Wilson, VA 24363 | $10,393 |
106 | Gerald W Statzer Sr | Bristol, VA 24201 | $10,200 |
107 | Claude E Thompson | Ararat, VA 24053 | $10,176 |
108 | David Cope | Jonesville, VA 24263 | $10,129 |
109 | Ray Allen Roark | Bristol, VA 24202 | $10,097 |
110 | Jerry Edward Legg | Duffield, VA 24244 | $10,024 |
111 | Edward H Stokes | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $9,959 |
112 | William C Kelly Sr | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $9,903 |
113 | Jerry D Helton | Rowe, VA 24646 | $9,858 |
114 | James Lee Hash | Independence, VA 24348 | $9,765 |
115 | Wade Hampton | Sparta, NC 28675 | $9,758 |
116 | Thomas W Edwards | Sugar Grove, VA 24375 | $9,612 |
117 | Fred B Gent Dvm | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $9,603 |
118 | Howard Gilmer Estate | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $9,588 |
119 | Jay Frank Robinette | Duffield, VA 24244 | $9,554 |
120 | Harry D Hill | Ararat, VA 24053 | $9,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”