Counter Cyclical Program in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,256
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $1,440,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | E R Watson Jr | Elk Creek, VA 24326 | $3,214 |
102 | James E Dunkley Jr | Ivanhoe, VA 24350 | $3,212 |
103 | Barbara Smith Edwards | Woodlawn, VA 24381 | $3,201 |
104 | Willie F Via Estate | Patrick Springs, VA 24133 | $3,158 |
105 | Leon Cole | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $3,145 |
106 | Edmond Hensley | Rose Hill, VA 24281 | $3,141 |
107 | Kegley Farms Inc | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $3,110 |
108 | L C Hobbs Jr | Bristol, VA 24202 | $3,075 |
109 | Debusk Farm Inc | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $3,065 |
110 | Earl D Fogleman | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $3,051 |
111 | David Overbay | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $3,032 |
112 | J & B Farms Inc | Max Meadows, VA 24360 | $3,020 |
113 | Billy C Barker | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $3,019 |
114 | Barns Co Farm | Tazewell, VA 24651 | $3,016 |
115 | John Hugh Meade | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $2,976 |
116 | Walker Paving | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $2,970 |
117 | Phipps & Sons Inc | Mouth Of Wilson, VA 24363 | $2,888 |
118 | Samuel D Rock | Bristol, VA 24202 | $2,879 |
119 | Mary H Rock | Abingdon, VA 24211 | $2,879 |
120 | Everett C Ward | Rural Retreat, VA 24368 | $2,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”