Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Virginia
(Rep. Morgan Griffith)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24,403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $228,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kegley Farms Of Pulaski LLC | Pulaski, VA 24301 | $1,916,663 |
2 | Snake Creek Farms | Hillsville, VA 24343 | $1,798,182 |
3 | Stuart Land & Cattle Co Of Virginia Inc | Rosedale, VA 24280 | $1,535,936 |
4 | Highland Dairy Farm | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $1,418,916 |
5 | G & G Livestock LLC | Max Meadows, VA 24360 | $1,323,683 |
6 | Wescor Farming LLC | Independence, VA 24348 | $1,219,204 |
7 | Alan Mitchell | Claudville, VA 24076 | $1,203,151 |
8 | Hillside Farm Inc | Dublin, VA 24084 | $1,000,156 |
9 | Stokes Farm And Livestock LLC | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $1,000,000 |
10 | Huffard Dairy Farms | Crockett, VA 24323 | $953,175 |
11 | Daniel Mccall Johnson | Abingdon, VA 24212 | $915,078 |
12 | Wolfpen Farm LLC | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $885,947 |
13 | Leonard Craig Hammond | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $830,678 |
14 | Pageton Farms LLC | Sugar Grove, VA 24375 | $781,795 |
15 | Steven T Mccroskey Dba Rivergate Farms | Mendota, VA 24270 | $778,939 |
16 | Donald D Baker | Galax, VA 24333 | $738,198 |
17 | Green Valley Poultry Farm | Abingdon, VA 24212 | $734,862 |
18 | Countiss Dairy LLC | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $709,786 |
19 | Reyes Nature Greens, LLC | Independence, VA 24348 | $698,861 |
20 | Spurlin Farms Inc | Galax, VA 24333 | $662,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>