Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of Washington (Rep. Rick Larsen), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of Washington (Rep. Rick Larsen) totaled $1,452,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Penn Cove Farms LLC | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $4,885 |
22 | Lopez Island Vineyard Inc | Lopez Island, WA 98261 | $4,857 |
23 | San Juan Vineyards | Friday Harbor, WA 98250 | $4,776 |
24 | Ray E Gabelein | Langley, WA 98260 | $3,479 |
25 | Engle Farms | Coupeville, WA 98239 | $3,176 |
26 | Ed Van Rensum | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $2,915 |
27 | Sweet Grass Farm LLC | Lopez Island, WA 98261 | $1,914 |
28 | Rex Ritchie | Lopez Island, WA 98261 | $1,866 |
29 | Nicholas L Jones | Lopez Island, WA 98261 | $1,863 |
30 | Rick Nootenboom | Coupeville, WA 98239 | $1,525 |
31 | Ron Christensen | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $1,234 |
32 | Frederick Van Benschoten II | Clinton, WA 98236 | $977 |
33 | Colleen Howe | Friday Harbor, WA 98250 | $914 |
34 | John W King | Seattle, WA 98112 | $812 |
35 | D & D Seed Company | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $812 |
36 | Alan Hall | Stanwood, WA 98282 | $769 |
37 | Beachview Farms Inc | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $707 |
38 | George Rector | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $374 |
39 | Christine M Goodwin | Oak Harbor, WA 98277 | $360 |
40 | Albert Luhn | Clinton, WA 98236 | $342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”