Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of Washington (Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 107
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of Washington (Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler) totaled $1,925,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Randy C Lawffer | Amboy, WA 98601 | $1,045 |
82 | Cyril O Gillette | Amboy, WA 98601 | $1,045 |
83 | Keith Dalia | Vancouver, WA 98662 | $1,045 |
84 | Joshua Joner | Amboy, WA 98601 | $1,045 |
85 | Phyllis J Ogden | Castle Rock, WA 98611 | $1,012 |
86 | James Mcphee | Ridgefield, WA 98642 | $999 |
87 | Bernard L Ogden | Castle Rock, WA 98611 | $990 |
88 | Cornelius Chan | Brush Prairie, WA 98606 | $987 |
89 | William J Faubion | Cathlamet, WA 98612 | $935 |
90 | English Estate Inc | Vancouver, WA 98684 | $922 |
91 | Jason A Lee | Ridgefield, WA 98642 | $880 |
92 | Mark Stovner | Washougal, WA 98671 | $825 |
93 | Jason J Will | Cathlamet, WA 98612 | $776 |
94 | Thomas P Bosch | Skamokawa, WA 98647 | $770 |
95 | Jeff Stanley | Woodland, WA 98674 | $686 |
96 | Sandy Yoder | Woodland, WA 98674 | $673 |
97 | Roger B Snoey | Vancouver, WA 98685 | $660 |
98 | Kyle Lawffer | Amboy, WA 98601 | $619 |
99 | Jon Cotton | Brush Prairie, WA 98606 | $536 |
100 | Barry Young | Ridgefield, WA 98642 | $466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”