Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Washington (Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 346
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Washington (Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler) totaled $3,664,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edward N Videan Jr | Skamokawa, WA 98647 | $36,590 |
22 | Robert L Burkhalter | Rosburg, WA 98643 | $35,817 |
23 | Andrew Emlen | Skamokawa, WA 98647 | $33,002 |
24 | O Lynne Hacklin | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $32,412 |
25 | Kurt Fritsch | Skamokawa, WA 98647 | $32,000 |
26 | James H Byker | Kelso, WA 98626 | $29,027 |
27 | Johnston Dairy LLC | Camas, WA 98607 | $25,358 |
28 | Kozue Nakamura | La Center, WA 98629 | $24,560 |
29 | Aegerter Bros | Cathlamet, WA 98612 | $24,391 |
30 | Philip A Vik | Cathlamet, WA 98612 | $22,856 |
31 | Ivan Rayworth Jr | Battle Ground, WA 98604 | $21,123 |
32 | Mountain View Dairy | Ridgefield, WA 98642 | $21,000 |
33 | Eugene Winders | Amboy, WA 98601 | $19,979 |
34 | Gerrit Van Tol | La Center, WA 98629 | $19,551 |
35 | Poul Toftemark | Rosburg, WA 98643 | $19,547 |
36 | George Nosko | Battle Ground, WA 98604 | $19,168 |
37 | Lorraine M Eastvold | Cathlamet, WA 98612 | $18,270 |
38 | Robert J Smith | Woodland, WA 98674 | $18,063 |
39 | Paul Alexander Mintz | Battle Ground, WA 98604 | $17,602 |
40 | Jeffrey Baldwin | Skamokawa, WA 98647 | $16,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”