Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 134

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $4,419,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
41John D HartMercer Island, WA 98040$26,724
42C & R Ranch Limited PartnershipEltopia, WA 99330$24,851
43Richard R MooreKahlotus, WA 99335$23,466
44Kathleen HudlowConnell, WA 99326$23,186
45Earle T Copp Test TrustSpokane, WA 99220$23,165
46Van Hollebeke Livestock Joint VenturePasco, WA 99301$20,512
47Coordes Farms Joint VentureEltopia, WA 99330$19,568
48Arnold Van HollebekePasco, WA 99301$19,253
49Marilyn Van HollebekePasco, WA 99301$19,253
50Wayne F KlindworthConnell, WA 99326$17,215
51Lois KlindworthConnell, WA 99326$17,211
52Mildred B Copp Testamentary TrustSpokane, WA 99220$15,618
53John Merle MontgomeryThe Villages, FL 32162$15,425
54Geraldine E BaldwinAuburn, WA 98001$15,264
55Moore Farms Co IncKahlotus, WA 99335$15,191
56Ruth C Loeber TrustFort Myers, FL 33919$14,970
57Stephen C HuntPortland, ME 04101$14,624
58L G Blair Farms IncPasco, WA 99301$14,520
591 Moore Ag LLCKahlotus, WA 99335$14,510
60Yerbich Farms IncPasco, WA 99301$14,498

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag