Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 134

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $4,419,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
61Tri-h Farm LLCKahlotus, WA 99335$13,780
62Elizabeth K Mcfarland TrustWalla Walla, WA 99362$13,522
63Dorothy SanchezIssaquah, WA 98029$12,513
64Klaus LandsDenver, CO 80218$11,868
65Burton TylerSunnyside, WA 98944$10,962
66Elizabeth T OstenSkokie, IL 60076$10,962
67Candi Moore RoachKahlotus, WA 99335$10,507
68Estate Of Leatha DoughertyDeer Park, WA 99006$10,414
69Keith Edwin RogersPasco, WA 99301$8,581
70Virginia B DunbarRidgefield, WA 98642$8,443
71R C Watson Trust APasco, WA 99301$7,637
72Jacqueline Campbell TrustLoon Lake, WA 99148$7,155
73Richard R Rehn TrustLoon Lake, WA 99148$6,745
74Jan CoxWalla Walla, WA 99362$6,632
75Victoria M HeiderRichland, WA 99352$6,455
76Kimberly Karen EnglishPasco, WA 99301$6,184
77Scott A EnglishMesa, WA 99343$6,184
78L & T Farms LLCConnell, WA 99326$6,146
79Barbara L PalanioDeer Park, WA 99006$5,893
80Stanley WoodyKennewick, WA 99336$5,892

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag