Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 242
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $5,341,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Casey Cochrane | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $9,099 |
142 | Tri-h Farm LLC | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $9,044 |
143 | Lexi L Moore | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $8,919 |
144 | , | $8,919 | |
145 | Hockett Ranch Corp | Holladay, UT 84117 | $8,889 |
146 | Bauermeister Farms Inc | Camano Island, WA 98282 | $8,622 |
147 | Hollenback Farms Inc | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $8,317 |
148 | Blackman Fam Tr Dtd 06-24-1999 | Bonita, CA 91902 | $8,114 |
149 | Johnemma L.l.c. | Redmond, WA 98052 | $7,941 |
150 | Todd Van Hollebeke | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,718 |
151 | Windy Acres Farm Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,652 |
152 | Leonard Van Buren | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,629 |
153 | Tami Van Buren | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,629 |
154 | Victoria M Heider | Richland, WA 99352 | $7,524 |
155 | Vivian Loomis Family LLC | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,453 |
156 | Kathryn C Randall | Port Orchard, WA 98366 | $7,356 |
157 | Brenda L Herron | Pasco, WA 99301 | $7,356 |
158 | Robert Kent Herron | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $7,356 |
159 | John L Neff | Austin, TX 78731 | $7,115 |
160 | James M Neff | Seattle, WA 98115 | $7,115 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”