Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 723
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $157,218,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H-4 Farms Partnership | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $4,511,840 |
2 | Grassl Farms | Pasco, WA 99301 | $3,161,215 |
3 | Van Buren Farms Jv | Pasco, WA 99301 | $2,691,287 |
4 | Kaysons Partnership | Connell, WA 99326 | $2,140,818 |
5 | Herron Brothers Partnership | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,986,765 |
6 | Community First Bank ** | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $1,805,771 |
7 | Ross Ranch Joint Venture | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $1,614,958 |
8 | Imz Joint Venture | Washougal, WA 98671 | $1,598,623 |
9 | S & H Joint Venture | Yakima, WA 98908 | $1,538,044 |
10 | H 4 Farms | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,511,943 |
11 | Lenwood Farms Inc | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,466,719 |
12 | Coordes Farms Joint Venture | Eltopia, WA 99330 | $1,373,072 |
13 | Norma Page | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $1,328,301 |
14 | Wiswall Ag Partnership | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,310,612 |
15 | Juniper Dunes Ranch Inc | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,256,901 |
16 | Duane Lee Lathim Estate | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,245,280 |
17 | Anita Lathim | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,245,274 |
18 | Amber Fields Inc | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,213,554 |
19 | Richard & Judy Wiswall Partnershi | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,160,155 |
20 | Thompson Farms Inc | Hartline, WA 99135 | $1,158,760 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>