Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,967
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $23,954,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cruz Navarro | Colville, WA 99114 | $132,226 |
22 | Barker Enterprises Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $130,282 |
23 | D & K Farming Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $127,873 |
24 | Darilane Farm LLC | Elk, WA 99009 | $127,173 |
25 | C & S Farms Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $118,464 |
26 | Pearl Farms LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $117,897 |
27 | Randy James And Terri James Dba James Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $116,870 |
28 | Hill View Farms Jv | Cheney, WA 99004 | $114,879 |
29 | Blachly & Sons | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $112,783 |
30 | Roecks Farms Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $112,721 |
31 | Carlton Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $112,446 |
32 | Carlson Farms Jv | Addy, WA 99101 | $111,613 |
33 | Boulder Creek Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $106,475 |
34 | Wp Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $106,031 |
35 | Loren & Denise Beale | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $102,902 |
36 | Shoun Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $99,910 |
37 | Td Walsh Farms Inc | Colbert, WA 99005 | $99,525 |
38 | Pottratz & Tiegs Farms Joint Venture | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $98,378 |
39 | Duane Lashaw Farms Inc | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $97,196 |
40 | G M Farms | Latah, WA 99018 | $96,548 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”