Farm Subsidy information
5th District of Washington
(Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,571
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $38,010,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Just Farms, LLC | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $125,000 |
62 | Herres Land Co | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $124,806 |
63 | Daniel J Schmitz | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $123,600 |
64 | Slaybaugh Bros Part | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $123,554 |
65 | Dashiell-garcia Jv | Rockford, WA 99030 | $122,590 |
66 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $120,979 |
67 | Sam Heitstuman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $120,102 |
68 | Scheibe Farms | Anatone, WA 99401 | $116,936 |
69 | Kenneth & Janine Weiss LLC | Asotin, WA 99402 | $114,794 |
70 | Eckhart Farms LLC | Deer Park, WA 99006 | $114,560 |
71 | Crosby Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $114,554 |
72 | , | $113,186 | |
73 | Brt Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $112,433 |
74 | C2 D2 Joint Venture | Reardan, WA 99029 | $111,541 |
75 | Double F Ranch Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $109,590 |
76 | M3 Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $109,298 |
77 | Joneco Farms | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $109,156 |
78 | Robinette Ranches Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $109,027 |
79 | Chaju Land Co | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $108,615 |
80 | Casey M Holling | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $108,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”