Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 121
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $156,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Grace Phillipson | Kent, WA 98030 | $303 |
82 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $299 |
83 | Bryan C Dobbins | Cheney, WA 99004 | $272 |
84 | Dee A A Erickson | Spokane, WA 99223 | $270 |
85 | Edward Erickson | Put In Bay, OH 43456 | $270 |
86 | Lewis E Bishop | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $268 |
87 | Michael Archer | Incline Village, NV 89451 | $243 |
88 | Eleanor Ward | Marshalltown, IA 50158 | $242 |
89 | Keith Baldwin | Kettle Falls, WA 99141 | $226 |
90 | Claudia L Ramm | Spokane, WA 99203 | $225 |
91 | Fred G Whitener | Bountiful, UT 84010 | $220 |
92 | Drew Perry | Cheney, WA 99004 | $213 |
93 | A Richard Juris | Dayton, WA 99328 | $209 |
94 | Hein Farms Inc | Spokane, WA 99223 | $200 |
95 | Goyke Farms Jv | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $187 |
96 | Jessie B And William W Day Trust | Dallas, TX 75283 | $184 |
97 | Kermit Rudolf Farm Land Trust | Seattle, WA 98101 | $184 |
98 | Matthew C Rudolf | Mercer Island, WA 98040 | $184 |
99 | Gary R Swanson | Loon Lake, WA 99148 | $163 |
100 | Catholic Diocese Of Spokane | Prescott, WA 99348 | $155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”