Farm Subsidy information
5th District of Washington
(Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,130
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $10,495,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Slg LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $31,356 |
82 | William P & Terrilie K Cox Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $31,349 |
83 | R.s.t. & C., Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $31,286 |
84 | Wilscot Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $30,774 |
85 | Bjk Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $30,644 |
86 | Mary Reeves | Asotin, WA 99402 | $29,919 |
87 | David Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $29,838 |
88 | Dean Reeves | Asotin, WA 99402 | $29,635 |
89 | Carla A Blachly | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $29,343 |
90 | Beau P Blachly | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $29,343 |
91 | Dixon Land LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $29,320 |
92 | Seibly Farms Inc | Anatone, WA 99401 | $28,799 |
93 | Kevin Botts | Anatone, WA 99401 | $28,726 |
94 | Tom Hendrickson - Tom And Kim Hendrickson Family T | Asotin, WA 99402 | $28,222 |
95 | Coulee Hite Enterprises Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $28,218 |
96 | Yochum Farm LLC | Terrace, WA 98043 | $27,998 |
97 | T & T Jv | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $27,969 |
98 | Dan England | Prescott, WA 99348 | $27,608 |
99 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $27,542 |
100 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $27,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”