Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,222

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $40,227,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
81Rattlers Run Farms IncFairfield, WA 99012$127,074
82Pataha Creek Farms IncPomeroy, WA 99347$124,669
83Turner Farms IncDayton, WA 99328$124,544
84Pine Grove Farms LLCSpangle, WA 99031$124,272
85Herres Land CoPomeroy, WA 99347$124,231
86Coulee Hite Enterprises IncReardan, WA 99029$123,924
87Tom D KeattsPomeroy, WA 99347$123,249
88Wagon Wheel Ranch IncFairfield, WA 99012$123,091
89Widman Farms IncSpokane, WA 99223$123,051
90Hanger Farms IncDayton, WA 99328$122,636
91Big Rock Farms IncValleyford, WA 99036$122,252
92Kaelin Farms IncSpokane, WA 99217$122,200
93Deruwe Rd Farms Joint VentureDayton, WA 99328$121,906
94Crosby Farms IncFairfield, WA 99012$121,828
95Dkl Farms IncPomeroy, WA 99347$121,050
96H C Dusty EckhartDeer Park, WA 99006$119,950
97M Lewis TalbottPrescott, WA 99348$119,315
98Jeanne W SchmitzRosalia, WA 99170$117,386
99Mcgourin Farms IncSpangle, WA 99031$117,031
100Joe A SchmitzRosalia, WA 99170$116,927

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag