Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 6,990
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $437,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Pataha Creek Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $674,860 |
122 | Carpenter Farms | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $673,587 |
123 | W Eric Thorn | Dayton, WA 99328 | $669,968 |
124 | Archer Farm | Dayton, WA 99328 | $665,907 |
125 | M Lewis Talbott | Prescott, WA 99348 | $664,863 |
126 | Rengaw Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $664,520 |
127 | Pat S Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $659,666 |
128 | Karlon Farms LLC | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $651,597 |
129 | Horseshoe-k | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $642,191 |
130 | Chaju Land Co | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $640,796 |
131 | Rattlers Run Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $637,478 |
132 | Coulee Hite Enterprises Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $636,361 |
133 | Darren Flaig | Spangle, WA 99031 | $633,600 |
134 | Juris Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $631,775 |
135 | Kenneth C Keno | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $631,718 |
136 | Glenn Warren | Dayton, WA 99328 | $631,538 |
137 | Hofmann Farms 96 | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $630,770 |
138 | Seney Farms J V | Starbuck, WA 99359 | $628,529 |
139 | Eric E Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $622,391 |
140 | Robert A Hutchens | Dayton, WA 99328 | $620,387 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”