Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 760
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $6,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bill Blessinger | Dayton, WA 99328 | $13,963 |
142 | Claassen Ag Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $13,748 |
143 | Dodge Heirs | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $13,691 |
144 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $13,646 |
145 | Claassen Bros | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $13,587 |
146 | Dashiell Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $13,150 |
147 | Watson Farms Trust | Canton, MI 48187 | $12,836 |
148 | Jennie Jill Woodward | Estacada, OR 97023 | $12,809 |
149 | Candice Harrison | Starbuck, WA 99359 | $12,809 |
150 | Mondovi LLC | Davenport, WA 99122 | $12,764 |
151 | Jeffrey A Sund | Spokane, WA 99217 | $12,757 |
152 | Van Ausdle Family Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $12,727 |
153 | Hendrickson Ranch | Asotin, WA 99402 | $12,514 |
154 | Polumsky Poverty Flat Farm LLC | Mead, WA 99021 | $12,459 |
155 | Samantha Jean Davis | Spokane, WA 99207 | $12,436 |
156 | Melvin Hall | Reardan, WA 99029 | $12,373 |
157 | Walter E Radmer | Medical Lake, WA 99022 | $12,209 |
158 | William Ahlf | Medical Lake, WA 99022 | $12,194 |
159 | Lazy K L & L Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $12,136 |
160 | Hg Etc LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $12,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”