Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,222

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $40,227,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
161Browne RanchClarkston, WA 99403$76,902
162Roger & Diane Koller JvPomeroy, WA 99347$76,844
163Daniel J SchmitzRosalia, WA 99170$76,235
164Jeff ApplefordAsotin, WA 99402$73,599
165Johnny D DixonPomeroy, WA 99347$72,986
166David J MundtRosalia, WA 99170$72,057
167Chaju Land CoRosalia, WA 99170$71,897
168Barjak Farms IncWaitsburg, WA 99361$71,884
169Hobart Farms IncAsotin, WA 99402$70,896
170Archer LLCWaitsburg, WA 99361$70,894
171Ruark Century Farm IncPomeroy, WA 99347$70,823
172Rodney K Von LeheCheney, WA 99004$70,524
173Jackson EstateDayton, WA 99328$70,449
174Dick Ledgerwood & Son IncClarkston, WA 99403$69,264
175Elden Felgenhauer Farms LLCSpokane, WA 99223$69,002
176Seibly Farms IncAnatone, WA 99401$68,554
177Kenneth & Debbie Ledgerwood JvPomeroy, WA 99347$68,288
178Erwin Farms JvPrescott, WA 99348$68,283
179John J MccawWaitsburg, WA 99361$68,254
180Vernon L KimblePomeroy, WA 99347$68,139

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag