Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 760
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $6,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Roy Leland | Spokane, WA 99223 | $12,043 |
162 | Ronald J Olmstead | Spokane, WA 99208 | $11,618 |
163 | C2s Farms Inc | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $11,567 |
164 | Nak Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $11,540 |
165 | David Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $11,137 |
166 | Phillip George | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $11,012 |
167 | Smith Hollow LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $10,960 |
168 | Bjk Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,820 |
169 | Carlson-anatone Inc | Anatone, WA 99401 | $10,763 |
170 | Greene Ridge Farms | Asotin, WA 99402 | $10,708 |
171 | Falling Springs Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,651 |
172 | Terry Hendrickson | Anatone, WA 99401 | $10,602 |
173 | John W Flerchinger | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $10,498 |
174 | Linda Koback | Mica, WA 99023 | $10,480 |
175 | Boyd Farms Jv Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,426 |
176 | Andrew J Purvis | Bothell, WA 98021 | $10,108 |
177 | Vista View Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,003 |
178 | Thomas Wayne Beale | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,879 |
179 | Dodd Farms | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $9,844 |
180 | Bingman Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”