Loan Deficiency in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,823
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $34,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Dick Ledgerwood & Son Inc | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $50,116 |
162 | Miller & Miller Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $49,613 |
163 | Buddy Sampson | Hunters, WA 99137 | $49,276 |
164 | Steven F And Phyllis A Schreck Jv | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $48,998 |
165 | Jay Holling | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $48,937 |
166 | B & B Farms | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $48,897 |
167 | Tom Solbrack | Colfax, WA 99111 | $48,889 |
168 | Loren & Denise Beale | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $48,307 |
169 | Dudley E Frick | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $48,134 |
170 | James Leid | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $48,099 |
171 | Lynnville L Bruce | Rosalia, WA 99176 | $48,066 |
172 | Ntn Ranches | Dayton, WA 99328 | $47,892 |
173 | Eric E Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $47,609 |
174 | 7jk Ranch | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $47,601 |
175 | Michael D Laib | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $47,184 |
176 | Charles H Kausche | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $47,163 |
177 | Wilscot Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $46,868 |
178 | Hamilton Farms Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $46,848 |
179 | Joneco Farms | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $46,731 |
180 | Robert E Holling | Spokane, WA 99223 | $46,682 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”