Counter Cyclical Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,256
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $1,921,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tetrick Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,191 |
22 | Tom D Keatts | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,031 |
23 | Michael & Alice Gwinn Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,792 |
24 | William P & Terrilie K Cox Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,706 |
25 | Rosmar Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $9,636 |
26 | Hill View Farms J V | Cheney, WA 99004 | $9,588 |
27 | Bafus Bros Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $9,562 |
28 | Randy J Koller | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,419 |
29 | Slaybaugh Bros Part | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $8,837 |
30 | Pine Grove Farms LLC | Spangle, WA 99031 | $8,587 |
31 | Tom Archer | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $8,568 |
32 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $8,532 |
33 | Duane Widman | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $8,529 |
34 | Wynn Stallcop | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $8,492 |
35 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $8,460 |
36 | Penner Farms Joint Venture | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $8,262 |
37 | Peola Farms Inc | Juliaetta, ID 83535 | $8,238 |
38 | Bob Bingman | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $8,116 |
39 | Mac Bros Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $8,048 |
40 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $7,888 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”