Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 767
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $6,775,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $217,944 |
2 | F & R Farms | Starbuck, WA 99359 | $94,280 |
3 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $84,107 |
4 | Claassen Ag Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $75,554 |
5 | Wp Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $71,648 |
6 | View Point Farm Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $64,220 |
7 | Bingman Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $61,853 |
8 | Michael E Flerchinger | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $61,450 |
9 | Lasater Bbg Inc | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $61,188 |
10 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $55,583 |
11 | Hinchliff & Sons Inc | Broomfield, CO 80023 | $52,686 |
12 | Hostetler Jv | Asotin, WA 99402 | $51,124 |
13 | Dutch Flat Angus LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $50,590 |
14 | Dan England | Prescott, WA 99348 | $50,000 |
15 | Hodgen Family Trust | Spokane, WA 99203 | $50,000 |
16 | Ferrell Family Farms | Spokane, WA 99223 | $49,837 |
17 | Timothy Tucker | Moyie Springs, ID 83845 | $49,813 |
18 | Haidee H Tucker Estate | Paterson, WA 99345 | $49,813 |
19 | James F Fitzgerald | Cheney, WA 99004 | $49,329 |
20 | Christine K Fitzgerald | Cheney, WA 99004 | $49,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>