Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 291

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $2,060,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
1Tom Hendrickson - Tom And Kim Hendrickson Family TAsotin, WA 99402$69,783
2Barker Enterprises Joint VentureDayton, WA 99328$62,328
3Broughton Land CoDayton, WA 99328$60,191
4John D DawsonColville, WA 99114$50,014
5Jeffrey Douglas DawsonColville, WA 99114$45,807
6Dick Ledgerwood & Son IncClarkston, WA 99403$45,803
7Klaveano Ranches IncPomeroy, WA 99347$38,891
8Seney Land & Livestock Joint VentureDayton, WA 99328$37,169
9Sam HeitstumanClarkston, WA 99403$36,639
10Dixon Land And Livestock Joint VenturePomeroy, WA 99347$33,534
11Samantha J CharriereClarkston, WA 99403$31,592
12Kimberley Black Cattle Co LLCClarkston, WA 99403$30,912
13Appleford FarmAnatone, WA 99401$30,110
14Ww Cattle LLCAsotin, WA 99402$29,883
15Hostetler JvAsotin, WA 99402$28,793
16Beale Meadow Creek Ranch IncPomeroy, WA 99347$28,598
17Kevin BottsAnatone, WA 99401$28,540
18Kevin WhittakerClarkston, WA 99403$25,185
19Larsen BrothersColville, WA 99114$23,960
20Luhn Cattle LLCAsotin, WA 99402$23,673

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag