Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,569
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $10,367,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jim & Linda Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $60,165 |
22 | Dixon Land And Livestock Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $58,665 |
23 | Barker Enterprises Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $55,787 |
24 | Rolling Hills Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $53,874 |
25 | Roecks Farms Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $53,133 |
26 | Greene Ridge Farms | Asotin, WA 99402 | $53,133 |
27 | Wp Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $52,939 |
28 | Td Walsh Farms Inc | Colbert, WA 99005 | $52,167 |
29 | Pearl Farms LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $51,750 |
30 | Hg Etc LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $50,789 |
31 | Lambert L & L Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $49,716 |
32 | Overtime Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $49,225 |
33 | Mpj Farms Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $48,823 |
34 | Kaelin Farms Inc | Spokane, WA 99217 | $47,944 |
35 | Janson Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $47,669 |
36 | Hill View Farms Jv | Cheney, WA 99004 | $45,553 |
37 | C & S Farms Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $44,832 |
38 | Pottratz & Tiegs Farms Joint Venture | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $44,213 |
39 | Joneco Farms | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $44,204 |
40 | Green View Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $43,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”