Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 91
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $62,497 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven E Henningfield Farm LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $277 |
62 | Richard Isaacson Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $256 |
63 | Rachel E Rank | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $248 |
64 | Kenneth J Uhlenhake | Burlington, WI 53105 | $223 |
65 | Peter C Novak | Franksville, WI 53126 | $223 |
66 | Scott Fredrickson | Franksville, WI 53126 | $212 |
67 | Dorn Dairy LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $212 |
68 | David A Kirchner | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $209 |
69 | John Kevek Farms Inc | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $169 |
70 | Mark K Edquist | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $166 |
71 | Terry Weis | Burlington, WI 53105 | $155 |
72 | Greg Schaal | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $155 |
73 | Daryl Poisl Sr | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $151 |
74 | Brian G Dexter | Burlington, WI 53105 | $144 |
75 | Richard T Rehberg | Burlington, WI 53105 | $137 |
76 | Newholm Farms LLC | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $133 |
77 | Abigail Shannon Lippmann | Burlington, WI 53105 | $121 |
78 | William Erickson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $119 |
79 | Patricia Popp | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $117 |
80 | Jeffery A Schaefer | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”