Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Bryan Steil)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 498
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $6,774,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Leonard A Lois Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $12,728 |
102 | Meyer Family Farm | Bristol, WI 53104 | $12,569 |
103 | Robert Ryterski Jr | Franksville, WI 53126 | $12,460 |
104 | Bird Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $12,280 |
105 | Kenneth J Uhlenhake | Burlington, WI 53105 | $12,114 |
106 | Wayne C Wisnefski | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $11,964 |
107 | Allan R Zirbel | Salem, WI 53168 | $11,812 |
108 | Steven B Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $11,613 |
109 | Keith M Heineck | Franksville, WI 53126 | $11,610 |
110 | Rossi Farms Inc | Bristol, WI 53104 | $11,590 |
111 | J. Smith Farms, Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $11,527 |
112 | Terry Weis | Burlington, WI 53105 | $11,404 |
113 | Thomas Greil | Waterford, WI 53185 | $11,326 |
114 | Joseph Duffek | Waterford, WI 53185 | $11,293 |
115 | Jeffrey Badtke | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $11,233 |
116 | Edward Fliess | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $10,896 |
117 | K & K Farms | Big Bend, WI 53103 | $10,874 |
118 | Newholm Farms LLC | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $10,853 |
119 | Seth H Scott | Burlington, WI 53105 | $10,817 |
120 | Brian Schaal | Burlington, WI 53105 | $10,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”