Oilseed Program in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 410
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $1,570,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Norbert Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $10,010 |
42 | August J Storck & Laverne V Storc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $9,609 |
43 | James Rogers | Bristol, WI 53104 | $9,424 |
44 | John P Steinbrink | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $9,064 |
45 | Wallace G Brown | Darlington, WI 53530 | $8,975 |
46 | Thomas Greil | Waterford, WI 53185 | $8,952 |
47 | Robert F Fliess Jr | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $8,777 |
48 | Run N Deere Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $8,654 |
49 | Crane Grain | Burlington, WI 53105 | $8,542 |
50 | Dale Nelson Farms Inc | Woodworth, WI 53194 | $8,246 |
51 | Skewes Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $7,840 |
52 | Wayne C Wisnefski | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $7,559 |
53 | William Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $7,103 |
54 | Daniels Dairy II | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $7,100 |
55 | Paul Frost | Waterford, WI 53185 | $7,081 |
56 | Ronald Jorgensen | Franksville, WI 53126 | $6,873 |
57 | Jonathan J Bird & Karen J Bird Re | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $6,725 |
58 | Allan R Zirbel | Salem, WI 53168 | $6,682 |
59 | Thomas Fliess | Mount Pleasant, WI 53177 | $6,545 |
60 | Paul Beere | Burlington, WI 53105 | $6,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”