Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 670

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $21,597,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41August J Storck & Laverne V StorcKansasville, WI 53139$121,975
42James RogersBristol, WI 53104$121,046
43Emil M Mravec Revocable Trust Dated 4-15-2009Twin Lakes, WI 53181$115,732
44Himebauch FarmEast Troy, WI 53120$114,774
45Run N Deere FarmsBurlington, WI 53105$110,320
46Helding BrothersFranksville, WI 53126$107,348
47Mark S ProchaskaCaledonia, WI 53108$106,463
48Robert F Fliess JrKenosha, WI 53144$106,115
49Norbert FliessUnion Grove, WI 53182$104,370
50William FliessUnion Grove, WI 53182$104,027
51Skewes Farms IncUnion Grove, WI 53182$103,376
52W James SchmidtWaterford, WI 53185$99,399
53Thomas FliessMount Pleasant, WI 53177$98,744
54Lois BrosBurlington, WI 53105$98,241
55Leland & Bernelda Stohr RevocableTwin Lakes, WI 53181$97,672
56Jonathan J Bird & Karen J Bird ReKansasville, WI 53139$96,446
57Dale H NelsonWoodworth, WI 53194$94,027
58Lone Chestnut FarmsBurlington, WI 53105$93,166
59Keith M HeineckFranksville, WI 53126$91,333
60George J GoetzWadsworth, IL 60083$91,219

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag