Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan), 2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 304

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan) totaled $1,666,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
2023
21Lyle D KlostermanNew Glarus, WI 53574$16,898
22Reinmann Farmland TrustRockton, IL 61072$16,250
23Billy Dean HansonBrooklyn, WI 53521$16,035
24Lokken Living Trust Dated May 15, 2012Blanchardville, WI 53516$16,034
25Jerome N Daniels - Jerome N And Barbara J DanielsJuda, WI 53550$15,904
26Der Bauernhof Hofer LLCVerona, WI 53593$15,729
27Larry C FriedrichBlanchardville, WI 53516$15,590
28Mcguire & Sons Farm IncMonroe, WI 53566$15,587
29Christine E LangemoArgyle, WI 53504$14,148
30William G PickBrowntown, WI 53522$14,083
31Brian PedersonArgyle, WI 53504$14,067
32Robert T RuddNew Glarus, WI 53574$13,738
33Alan D NiemeierArgyle, WI 53504$13,082
34Teresa A HughesMonroe, WI 53566$12,406
35Michael W PowersLevering, MI 49755$12,246
36Nn Land PartnershipBrooklyn, WI 53521$11,968
37Karen A TalarczykNew Glarus, WI 53574$11,719
38Joseph E ZimmermanBrowntown, WI 53522$11,618
39David D WisnefskeMonroe, WI 53566$11,251
40David E ReesonBlanchardville, WI 53516$10,821

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag