Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 292

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan) totaled $1,632,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2022
21Michael L MillikenWinslow, IL 61089$17,771
22Wayne Albertson JrAlbany, WI 53502$17,161
23Gary L KleppeMonroe, WI 53566$17,082
24Lyle D KlostermanNew Glarus, WI 53574$16,898
25Billy Dean HansonBrooklyn, WI 53521$16,035
26Lokken Living Trust Dated May 15, 2012Blanchardville, WI 53516$16,034
27Jerome N Daniels - Jerome N And Barbara J DanielsJuda, WI 53550$15,904
28Der Bauernhof Hofer LLCVerona, WI 53593$15,729
29Larry C FriedrichBlanchardville, WI 53516$15,590
30Joseph E ZimmermanBrowntown, WI 53522$15,562
31Teresa A HughesMonroe, WI 53566$14,181
32William G PickBrowntown, WI 53522$14,083
33Robert T RuddNew Glarus, WI 53574$13,738
34Karen A TalarczykNew Glarus, WI 53574$13,440
35Nancy J AndersonBlanchardville, WI 53516$13,191
36Alan D NiemeierArgyle, WI 53504$13,082
37David D WisnefskeMonroe, WI 53566$12,794
38Michael W PowersLevering, MI 49755$12,246
39John Shea & Laurel Shea Revocable Living TrustChaseburg, WI 54621$12,122
40David E ReesonBlanchardville, WI 53516$10,821

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag