Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 297
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan) totaled $1,464,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dorothea Eichhoff | Madison, WI 53705 | $8,922 |
42 | Marvin G Rosenstiel | Browntown, WI 53522 | $8,816 |
43 | Elizabeth M Lemon | Madison, WI 53705 | $8,728 |
44 | Megan R Scheurell | Brodhead, WI 53520 | $8,610 |
45 | James Stocker | Monroe, WI 53566 | $8,579 |
46 | Glenn J Burgy | Monticello, WI 53570 | $8,570 |
47 | Jane Mitton - Picarski Family Trust Dated March 13 | Warrenville, IL 60555 | $8,485 |
48 | Garret Q Perry | New Glarus, WI 53574 | $8,477 |
49 | Aj Investments LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $8,328 |
50 | Kailee Farms LLC | St Charles, IL 60175 | $8,156 |
51 | Daniel J Reeson | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $8,029 |
52 | Nn Land Partnership | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $7,756 |
53 | Nicole C Meinert | Argyle, WI 53504 | $7,674 |
54 | Larson Farm Bville LLC | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $7,573 |
55 | Lisa M Teubel | Burlington, WI 53105 | $7,445 |
56 | James S Syse | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $7,444 |
57 | Marlin Bredeson | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $7,152 |
58 | Lawrence D Wedig | Darlington, WI 53530 | $7,053 |
59 | Leon N Wolfe | Darlington, WI 53530 | $6,867 |
60 | David L Aslakson | Argyle, WI 53504 | $6,821 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”