Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,030
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind) totaled $3,312,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gruber Acres | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $16,904 |
22 | Gary Christen | Strum, WI 54770 | $16,730 |
23 | Bruce Lippincott | Milton, WI 53563 | $16,697 |
24 | Russell R Martin | Lone Rock, WI 53556 | $16,565 |
25 | Charles Dienger | Holmen, WI 54636 | $15,672 |
26 | , | $15,443 | |
27 | Randy G Schaefer | Osseo, WI 54758 | $15,001 |
28 | Olsen Trust Dtd 05/08/2008-paul Olsen | Eleva, WI 54738 | $14,731 |
29 | Gari Lorenz | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $14,697 |
30 | Hamlin Valley Farms Inc | Strum, WI 54770 | $14,602 |
31 | Iverson Family Irrevocable Trust | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $14,148 |
32 | , | $14,132 | |
33 | Jeffrey Ruhland | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $14,109 |
34 | Semb Family Farm LLC | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $13,816 |
35 | Three Brothers Coulee Farm LLC | Onalaska, WI 54650 | $13,815 |
36 | Harlan & Marna Isom Rev Trust | Saint Paul, MN 55110 | $13,261 |
37 | Lyman E Back | Blair, WI 54616 | $13,145 |
38 | Gregory C Tollefson | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $13,081 |
39 | Patricia J Reinhardt | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $13,081 |
40 | James Adams | San Diego, CA 92117 | $12,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”