Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Ron Kind)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,725
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind) totaled $19,841,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Thomas S Brenner | Durand, WI 54736 | $53,009 |
102 | Spring Creeks Cattle LLC | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $52,187 |
103 | Granzow Farms LLC | Eastman, WI 54626 | $52,089 |
104 | Thomas J Hunger | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $51,964 |
105 | Donald J Anibas | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $50,720 |
106 | Jason W Schaffner | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $50,558 |
107 | Craig R Sosalla | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $50,499 |
108 | Swinn Valley Acres LLC | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $50,462 |
109 | Hill N Vale Acres Inc | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $48,287 |
110 | Alan J Hromadka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $47,988 |
111 | Jeffrey Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $47,144 |
112 | Todd Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $47,144 |
113 | Mellenthin Farms LLC | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $46,637 |
114 | Brad L Anderson | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $46,556 |
115 | Charles Storandt | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $46,077 |
116 | Spring Meadow Farms | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $44,625 |
117 | Thomas J Rotering | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $43,942 |
118 | , | $43,771 | |
119 | Richard Oldenburg | West Salem, WI 54669 | $43,524 |
120 | Todd Trocinski | Holmen, WI 54636 | $42,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”