Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 549
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind) totaled $15,172,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donald J Anibas | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $50,720 |
102 | Jason W Schaffner | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $50,558 |
103 | Denmar Ridge Farms LLC | Steuben, WI 54657 | $50,515 |
104 | Craig R Sosalla | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $50,499 |
105 | Swinn Valley Acres LLC | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $50,462 |
106 | Hill N Vale Acres Inc | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $48,287 |
107 | Jeffrey Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $47,144 |
108 | Todd Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $47,144 |
109 | Brad L Anderson | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $46,556 |
110 | Charles Storandt | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $46,077 |
111 | Mellenthin Farms LLC | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $45,749 |
112 | Spring Meadow Farms | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $44,625 |
113 | Thomas J Rotering | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $43,942 |
114 | , | $43,771 | |
115 | Richard Oldenburg | West Salem, WI 54669 | $43,524 |
116 | Todd Trocinski | Holmen, WI 54636 | $42,510 |
117 | Randy Mikshowsky | Bangor, WI 54614 | $41,676 |
118 | Kris A Bauer | Durand, WI 54736 | $41,579 |
119 | Paul G Cafferty | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $41,402 |
120 | Granzow Farms LLC | Eastman, WI 54626 | $41,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”