Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,219

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Ron Kind) totaled $114,717,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Scott ShecklerPrairie Du Chien, WI 53821$230,207
22Northwest Realty Investment CompaWaukesha, WI 53186$216,023
23Bruce LippincottMilton, WI 53563$212,860
24Mike GreenheckEagan, MN 55122$211,989
25Raymond C BabbSoldiers Grove, WI 54655$211,146
26Mississippi Valley Conservancy InLa Crosse, WI 54601$200,650
27Sidney JeromeBangor, WI 54614$198,315
28Kevin WerleinOnalaska, WI 54650$197,291
29Duane W BaardsethHolmen, WI 54636$196,658
30Dennis BortleGalesville, WI 54630$196,654
31Baecker Farms IncIndependence, WI 54747$195,636
32Michael D TorgersonBlair, WI 54616$194,857
33Harlan & Marna Isom Rev TrustPalm Desert, CA 92211$192,522
34Eric SkoyenOsseo, WI 54758$191,591
35David C WelterPrairie Du Chien, WI 53821$188,757
36Gale A Gabriel Rev TrustWhitehall, WI 54773$188,077
37Spencer J PedersonOsseo, WI 54758$185,681
38Cardinal InvestmentsCedarburg, WI 53012$182,542
39James M BauerDurand, WI 54736$181,960
40Robert F SyllaIndependence, WI 54747$181,832

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag