Counter Cyclical Program in 6th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Glenn Grothman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 439
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 6th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Glenn Grothman) totaled $3,501,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Joseph Wollinger | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,851 |
182 | Ralph W Plagenz | Dalton, WI 53926 | $4,787 |
183 | Loretta L Schulz | Dalton, WI 53926 | $4,763 |
184 | Leonard Zuhlke | Dalton, WI 53926 | $4,763 |
185 | Vern Stibb | Princeton, WI 54968 | $4,759 |
186 | Bruce Kobishop | Berlin, WI 54923 | $4,736 |
187 | David Bruss | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,725 |
188 | State Of Wi Dept Of Corrections | Waupun, WI 53963 | $4,700 |
189 | Terry Hupf | Princeton, WI 54968 | $4,694 |
190 | Mark Whitehouse | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,608 |
191 | James R Stellmacher | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,562 |
192 | Jeffery Morris | Berlin, WI 54923 | $4,390 |
193 | Charlotte Abel | Berlin, WI 54923 | $4,387 |
194 | Donald Bauman | Dalton, WI 53926 | $4,293 |
195 | Wayne W Berg | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,288 |
196 | Todd R Dukelow | Hancock, WI 54943 | $4,281 |
197 | Kenneth Pollesch | Markesan, WI 53946 | $4,261 |
198 | Harley Hoffman | Green Lake, WI 54941 | $4,237 |
199 | Leonard Verch | Princeton, WI 54968 | $4,234 |
200 | Ronald Goeden | Ripon, WI 54971 | $4,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”