Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Sean Duffy)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 282
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy) totaled $4,444,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sowinski Farms Inc | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $620,549 |
| 2 | Oneida Potato Exchange LLC | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $342,035 |
| 3 | Paragon Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $207,179 |
| 4 | James Lake Farms Inc | Three Lakes, WI 54562 | $147,817 |
| 5 | United Pride Dairy LLC | Phillips, WI 54555 | $135,452 |
| 6 | Jeffrey A Potter | Exeland, WI 54835 | $126,709 |
| 7 | Greenridge Farms LLC | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $108,797 |
| 8 | Glen W Albee | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $108,692 |
| 9 | Kretzschmar Holsteins Inc | Mellen, WI 54546 | $96,228 |
| 10 | , | $91,294 | |
| 11 | Rayala Cranberry Company | Manitowish Waters, WI 54545 | $83,405 |
| 12 | Joseph R Romportl | Spooner, WI 54801 | $70,124 |
| 13 | Sky Line Acres LLC | Merrill, WI 54452 | $69,767 |
| 14 | Tamarack Flowage Cranberry Co | Three Lakes, WI 54562 | $68,807 |
| 15 | Todd J Berweger | Ashland, WI 54806 | $65,987 |
| 16 | Jays Ginsing Inc | Schofield, WI 54476 | $65,647 |
| 17 | Ringa-lea Farms Inc | Barronett, WI 54813 | $65,591 |
| 18 | Edward A Stanger | Ladysmith, WI 54848 | $63,458 |
| 19 | Sue Yang | Mosinee, WI 54455 | $59,942 |
| 20 | , | $54,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
