Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Sean Duffy)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 887
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy) totaled $16,108,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey A Potter | Exeland, WI 54835 | $586,203 |
| 2 | Lake Nokomis Cranberries Inc | Eagle River, WI 54521 | $336,878 |
| 3 | Sowinski Farms Inc | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $317,245 |
| 4 | Wm Van Doorn & Sons Inc | Tony, WI 54563 | $306,079 |
| 5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $291,105 |
| 6 | James Lake Farms Inc | Three Lakes, WI 54562 | $272,000 |
| 7 | Legacy Farms LLC | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $179,850 |
| 8 | Pasanen Farms LLC | Exeland, WI 54835 | $178,737 |
| 9 | United Pride Dairy LLC | Phillips, WI 54555 | $176,058 |
| 10 | Deer Creek Farm Inc | Ashland, WI 54806 | $175,974 |
| 11 | Rayala Cranberry Company | Manitowish Waters, WI 54545 | $163,397 |
| 12 | Glen W Albee | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $162,746 |
| 13 | Kretzschmar Holsteins Inc | Mellen, WI 54546 | $158,854 |
| 14 | Larry A Fortuna | Weyerhaeuser, WI 54895 | $151,381 |
| 15 | Stutzman Family Farms LLC | Conrath, WI 54731 | $151,069 |
| 16 | Four Cubs Farm LLC | Grantsburg, WI 54840 | $149,939 |
| 17 | Ringa-lea Farms Inc | Barronett, WI 54813 | $147,729 |
| 18 | Rusk Rose Holsteins Inc | Ladysmith, WI 54848 | $147,591 |
| 19 | Bradley K Juedes | Merrill, WI 54452 | $147,489 |
| 20 | Thomas D Kriskovich | Ashland, WI 54806 | $146,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf