Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Sean Duffy)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,244
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy) totaled $177,816,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Pride Dairy LLC | Phillips, WI 54555 | $2,955,090 |
| 2 | Jeffrey A Potter | Exeland, WI 54835 | $2,751,571 |
| 3 | Chippewa View Farms LLC | Radisson, WI 54867 | $2,551,025 |
| 4 | Legacy Farms LLC | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $2,294,646 |
| 5 | Pasanen Farms LLC | Exeland, WI 54835 | $1,970,194 |
| 6 | Kretzschmar Holsteins Inc | Mellen, WI 54546 | $1,871,248 |
| 7 | Sowinski Farms Inc | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $1,821,996 |
| 8 | Four Cubs Farm LLC | Grantsburg, WI 54840 | $1,800,592 |
| 9 | Wm Van Doorn & Sons Inc | Tony, WI 54563 | $1,708,287 |
| 10 | Ringa-lea Farms Inc | Barronett, WI 54813 | $1,701,363 |
| 11 | Glen W Albee | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $1,644,906 |
| 12 | Deer Creek Farm Inc | Ashland, WI 54806 | $1,492,361 |
| 13 | West Lawn Enterprises | Sarona, WI 54870 | $1,467,986 |
| 14 | James A Melin | Grantsburg, WI 54840 | $1,326,449 |
| 15 | Rusk Rose Holsteins Inc | Ladysmith, WI 54848 | $1,289,370 |
| 16 | Thomas D Kriskovich | Ashland, WI 54806 | $1,150,049 |
| 17 | Birch Lane Farm | Spooner, WI 54801 | $1,103,054 |
| 18 | Dwight M Metcalf | Stone Lake, WI 54876 | $1,094,778 |
| 19 | Morgan R Peck | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $1,001,376 |
| 20 | Perlick Farms LLC | Sarona, WI 54870 | $962,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
