Deficiency Payment in 8th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mike Gallagher), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 282
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 8th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mike Gallagher) totaled $353,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Walter Rutz Jr | Brussels, WI 54204 | $1,943 |
62 | Bernard W Geisel | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,922 |
63 | Reginald H Vandertie | Forestville, WI 54213 | $1,906 |
64 | Jon A Schley | Brussels, WI 54204 | $1,903 |
65 | Andrew J Jandrin | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,902 |
66 | Stuart F Schulties | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,855 |
67 | Kenneth Uecker Estate | Algoma, WI 54201 | $1,853 |
68 | Mark S Hasenjager | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,828 |
69 | Jerry J Denil | Brussels, WI 54204 | $1,824 |
70 | Choice Inc | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,822 |
71 | John J Malcore | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $1,807 |
72 | Thomas O Leigh | Park Ridge, IL 60068 | $1,803 |
73 | Kenneth Staats | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,800 |
74 | Glenn Hasenjager | Baileys Harbor, WI 54202 | $1,781 |
75 | Harold Sunstrom | Sister Bay, WI 54234 | $1,776 |
76 | Bruce A Alberts | Brussels, WI 54204 | $1,765 |
77 | Paul W Kiehnau | Egg Harbor, WI 54209 | $1,740 |
78 | Clayton J Baudhuin | Brussels, WI 54204 | $1,715 |
79 | Norbert Haberli | Fish Creek, WI 54212 | $1,701 |
80 | James G Englebert | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $1,682 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”