Farm Subsidy information
8th District of Wisconsin
(Rep. Mike Gallagher)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mike Gallagher), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 341
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mike Gallagher) totaled $6,521,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Quietside Acres LLC | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $11,529 |
82 | Quality Crops LLC | New Franken, WI 54229 | $10,939 |
83 | James C Roder | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $10,883 |
84 | Cody David Kaye | Brussels, WI 54204 | $10,624 |
85 | Mark Gilbert | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $9,776 |
86 | Wayne W Maedke | Algoma, WI 54201 | $9,640 |
87 | Marc G Maedke | Algoma, WI 54201 | $9,625 |
88 | Devin R Schmidt | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $9,275 |
89 | Michael L Vandenhouten | Brussels, WI 54204 | $8,926 |
90 | Michael L Schley | Forestville, WI 54213 | $8,858 |
91 | Gary Alexander | Brussels, WI 54204 | $8,727 |
92 | Barry M Peterson | Green Bay, WI 54301 | $8,370 |
93 | Randy G Weckler | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,934 |
94 | Derek Joseph Schopf | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,784 |
95 | Wienke LLC | Algoma, WI 54201 | $7,671 |
96 | Bruce A Karsten | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,644 |
97 | Tom Sawyer | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,532 |
98 | Marvin G Schinktgen | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,447 |
99 | Timothy J Biwer | Fish Creek, WI 54212 | $7,321 |
100 | Mark S Hasenjager | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $6,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”