Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of West Virginia
(Rep. Alex Mooney)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 537
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney) totaled $2,380,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Horizons Farm Inc | Ranson, WV 25438 | $138,652 |
| 2 | John O Hardesty & Son LLC | Berryville, VA 22611 | $130,356 |
| 3 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $99,871 |
| 4 | James T Blue & Sons Inc | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $78,812 |
| 5 | Locust Grove Farm Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $75,313 |
| 6 | Satip Ghosh | Paw Paw, WV 25434 | $52,875 |
| 7 | Dm Logging LLC | Le Roy, WV 25252 | $52,875 |
| 8 | Rpm Resources LLC | Looneyville, WV 25259 | $52,875 |
| 9 | Martin Timber LLC | Reedy, WV 25270 | $52,875 |
| 10 | Ray V Bohrer | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $52,875 |
| 11 | Jason W Magaha | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $50,284 |
| 12 | Joseph A. Ware, III - Green Horizons Turf Farm | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $47,676 |
| 13 | Roberta V Mong - Rolling Acres Farm | Martinsburg, WV 25404 | $46,913 |
| 14 | Stewart W Ware | Ranson, WV 25438 | $40,929 |
| 15 | John Nicholas Kerchval - Summit Farms | Harpers Ferry, WV 25425 | $34,465 |
| 16 | Timothy Neill Banks - Alta Vista Farm | Harpers Ferry, WV 25425 | $33,401 |
| 17 | Burns Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $33,374 |
| 18 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $32,121 |
| 19 | Bullwalla Farms, LLC | Rippon, WV 25441 | $32,118 |
| 20 | Greystone Farm LLC | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $31,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf