Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of West Virginia (Rep. Carol Miller), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 110
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of West Virginia (Rep. Carol Miller) totaled $2,096,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tuckwiller Brothers Farm | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $17,873 |
42 | Oak Lawn Farm LLC | Cocoa, FL 32927 | $17,702 |
43 | William R Tuggle Jr | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $17,369 |
44 | Carroll S Willis | Alderson, WV 24910 | $17,063 |
45 | Jeffery P Utterback | Alderson, WV 24910 | $17,048 |
46 | John A Scott Jr | Princeton, WV 24740 | $17,022 |
47 | Rodger L Hedrick | Williamsburg, WV 24991 | $16,445 |
48 | Glen Ford | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $16,419 |
49 | Edward Knight III | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $16,090 |
50 | Tuckwiller Brothers Farms, LLC | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $15,857 |
51 | Clinton D Kirk | Alderson, WV 24910 | $15,510 |
52 | John Walter Nelson | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $15,479 |
53 | Julia W Lewis | Princeton, WV 24739 | $15,309 |
54 | Timothy Witek | Conestoga, PA 17516 | $15,300 |
55 | Joseph J Clay | Alderson, WV 24910 | $15,070 |
56 | Jimmie H Coffman | Sinks Grove, WV 24976 | $14,767 |
57 | Sam Tuckwiller LLC | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $14,484 |
58 | F Jane Workman | Renick, WV 24966 | $13,450 |
59 | Lynne W Bowman | White Sulphur Spring, WV 24986 | $13,342 |
60 | Stephen J Hedrick | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $13,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”