Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 652
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $3,818,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Estate Of John I Koop | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $40,724 |
2 | Peterson Farmland LLC | Des Moines, IA 50310 | $38,084 |
3 | Bgm Farms Inc | New Providence, IA 50206 | $37,306 |
4 | Nyle B Cottington - Nyle B & Janice K Cottington R | Jewell, IA 50130 | $37,191 |
5 | Bruce L Berggren - Berggren Revocable Trust | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $34,970 |
6 | Deborah K Berggren - Berggren Trust Agreement | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $34,970 |
7 | Richard W Heeren | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $34,398 |
8 | Nancy J Holt | Stratford, IA 50249 | $33,975 |
9 | Brian P Holt | Stratford, IA 50249 | $32,940 |
10 | Dean A Gillette | Miles City, MT 59301 | $31,999 |
11 | Amy Kleckner | Webster City, IA 50595 | $30,968 |
12 | Bryan Gilbert | Webster City, IA 50595 | $30,968 |
13 | Nancy A Wehrheim | Solon, IA 52333 | $30,306 |
14 | Carol Schlotfeldt | Webster City, IA 50595 | $29,279 |
15 | Glenda Peterson L/est | Nevada, IA 50201 | $29,124 |
16 | Douglas Nelson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $28,113 |
17 | Thomas Todd Krumm | Boone, IA 50036 | $26,830 |
18 | Boone Forks Farm Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $26,739 |
19 | Thomas Masterson | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $26,218 |
20 | Terry D Olson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $26,037 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>