Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 633
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $3,725,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peterson Farmland LLC | Des Moines, IA 50310 | $38,084 |
| 2 | Craig P Johnson | Jewell, IA 50130 | $37,838 |
| 3 | Dean A Gillette | Miles City, MT 59301 | $37,797 |
| 4 | Bgm Farms Inc | New Providence, IA 50206 | $37,300 |
| 5 | Nyle B Cottington - Nyle B & Janice K Cottington R | Jewell, IA 50130 | $37,191 |
| 6 | Bruce L Berggren - Berggren Revocable Trust | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $34,970 |
| 7 | Deborah K Berggren - Berggren Trust Agreement | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $34,970 |
| 8 | Nancy J Holt | Stratford, IA 50249 | $33,975 |
| 9 | Brian P Holt | Stratford, IA 50249 | $32,940 |
| 10 | Amy Kleckner | Webster City, IA 50595 | $30,968 |
| 11 | Bryan Gilbert | Webster City, IA 50595 | $30,968 |
| 12 | Nancy A Wehrheim | Solon, IA 52333 | $30,306 |
| 13 | Boone Forks Farm Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $30,302 |
| 14 | Thomas Masterson | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $29,709 |
| 15 | Carol Schlotfeldt | Webster City, IA 50595 | $29,279 |
| 16 | Glenda Peterson L/est | Nevada, IA 50201 | $29,124 |
| 17 | Estate Of Dolores H Schaa | Webster City, IA 50595 | $28,880 |
| 18 | Ryan Richard Davison | Webster City, IA 50595 | $28,230 |
| 19 | Douglas Nelson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $28,113 |
| 20 | Thomas Todd Krumm | Boone, IA 50036 | $26,830 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf