Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,108
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Kansas totaled $13,803,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcclure Brothers Land & Cattle Operating Ptr | Douglass, KS 67039 | $584,850 |
2 | Henry Creek Farms Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $387,669 |
3 | Rau Farms Ptr Of LLC's | Derby, KS 67037 | $311,603 |
4 | La Land And Cattle Inc | Benton, KS 67017 | $249,916 |
5 | Promax Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $227,509 |
6 | Michael D Bohannan | Augusta, KS 67010 | $221,870 |
7 | Klingenberg Farms Inc | Peabody, KS 66866 | $209,977 |
8 | Plum Grove Farms | Potwin, KS 67123 | $209,813 |
9 | Michael Dean Schauf | Douglass, KS 67039 | $199,486 |
10 | Varner Farms Inc | Towanda, KS 67144 | $197,346 |
11 | Ronald Busenitz Inc | El Dorado, KS 67042 | $181,181 |
12 | Gordon D Stands | El Dorado, KS 67042 | $178,307 |
13 | Mdm Land And Cattle General Partnership | Douglass, KS 67039 | $175,747 |
14 | Harder Farms Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $164,313 |
15 | Golden Rule Farms | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $161,037 |
16 | Damian Korte | Latham, KS 67072 | $148,903 |
17 | Blue Mound Farms LLC | Burns, KS 66840 | $144,939 |
18 | Charles Entz Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $134,853 |
19 | Triple T Livestock LLC | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $131,628 |
20 | M D M Farms LLC | Douglass, KS 67039 | $130,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>